|
The 1999 Mallory and Irvine Research Expedition discovered the body of George Mallory high on Mount Everest. And what a sight it was - his alabaster body perfectly preserved with his beard stubble still visible.The book contains the known history of June 6, 1924 along with Jochem's attempt to piece together what might have happened. The photographs of Mallory and his personal effects, including his boot, watch, letters and pocket knife, are fascinating. Affimer.org and Nova contains lots of information and photos.
perhaps he has that 1924 expedition camera still on him and perhaps if that camera can be found and our modern sophisticated techniques be brought to bear on developing that film which is hopefully still inside the camera and preserved by the extreme cold, we can establish from such film that they made it after all." But then, how would this square from those who have suggested that the team split up and it was the "more experienced Mallory" who went for the summit leaving Irvine [with the alleged camera] to 'wait' but then too, it was the body of 'Mallory' who was found with, inter alia, the broken leg injury, not Irvine. Holzel [January 19, 2007] to which I personally subscribe therein based on my own research of the Mallory and Irvine matter and which his remarks and analysis additionally serve to support. Who else could that be but Irvine. What I'm saying here is that for each, shall we say, 'questioning' of the NON likelihood of a M&I summit, there appears a handy counter-argument although the counter-arguments begin to enter the realm of a 'stretch' because even with the best of expertise and equipment available 'today' and forget about Sherpa guides or fixed ropes or modern climbing gear, it is a very difficult climb even with the best of weather. I think [see the DVD on this issue] it's been reduced to one person musing and I cite 'in substance' because I don't have the direct quote in front of me but the person said, again in substance, "Somewhere up there is the body of 'Sandy' Irvine. But as reviewer Holzel correctly suggests, and I concur forthwith, this reversal of a negative is indeed a "house of cards." Quite frankly, it's a ploy often used when reversing the premise is easier than defending the opposing view(s) with reasonable [versus 'stretched'] arguendo. And when the doubter is de facto placed in this kind of scenario and is literally forced to say, "Well, I can't definitively prove that they did not but I can provide." whereupon the doubter is quickly interrupted and a voiced "Ahhhhhhh." comes from the pro-summit challenger as if to say "wellllll then, if you can't 'prove' that they did 'not' make the summit, isn't it then possible that they 'did' make the summit." And so it goes.
So too and covering new ground here [at least in terms of the Amazon discussions on the matter], let's recall that the original 1999 search mission expedition was expecting to find the 1924 body of 'Irvine' and this was predicated on the '1933' Irvine 'ice ax' finding and it was a surprise to the 1999 expedition folks to find that the discovered body [which was calculated to lay somewhere near the ice ax finding and hence a conjectured 'Irvine' fall] was not Irvine at all but Mallory. Not to mention the still visible rope around Mallory indicative of his being roped to someone. There are some excellent reviews here and before going any further I will render particular public kudos to the review of T. Well, this is conjectured to be either a "spare set" []. ==or== an evening descent. And negotiating Everest above 26,000 feet on 'any' approach route during darkness is something else again. Maybe yes, maybe no." -- I'm inclined towards a defended "no" [and for many more reasons than space allows me to list and discuss at length] but then the whole issue seems to be that for every "no summit" out there, a counter-argument is offered for a "yes summit" or at miniumum, a proffered 'perhaps a summit', so then, ultimately, and bottom line, it becomes the individual reader who makes the call based on their own assessment and the arguments presented, pro and con therein. The 'compromise' of course becomes "Who is to say.
Reviewer Holzel also makes a very important and valid statement when he talks of what I would term the old premise reversal, if you will, where M&I [Mallory and Irvine] supporters simply 'reverse' their premise and put the onus of proof on the 'doubter', and this is a tactic that has been utilized in other 'questionable' areas as well, in effect, can the M&I 'doubter' [that M&I ever made the summit] "prove that M&I did 'not' make the summit" -- see how that works. And so it continues, 'perhaps this, perhaps that, maybe this, maybe that' , but in the end that which we 'do' have and IMO of course, becomes more in favor of M&I 'not' having made the summit but I'll qualify that by saying this is just as valid as [again, see the DVD] as the pro-summit M&I folks saying, "Unless someone can prove []. But then it begins from various M&I summit supporters. "perhaps Mallory was coming 'down' from an Everest summit." And when Mallory's sun goggles are found in his pocket, what about that fact. to me that M&I did 'not' make the summit, I'll continue to believe that they did." And there we stand. Doc Tony
Its pages demand the reader's undivided attention and are sure to enthrall all mystery lovers, Everest aficionados, nostalgia junkies, history buffs, and climbing enthusiasts. Their reconstruction of Mallory's and Irvine's last climb is riveting. It makes for a spell binding narrative, as past events are woven through present day ones. The beautiful photographs of the personal effects found upon Mallory's person underscore a certain poignancy about the discovery of Mallory's well preserved body. The book chronicles the search for George Mallory and Andrew Irvine by the 1999 Mallory & Irvine Research Expedition. It juxtaposes the dramatic turn of events during their expedition with those of the 1924 British Everest Expedition which saw Mallory and Irvine attempt a summit climb, only to disappear into the mists of Everest, never to be seen again. This is a beautifully and lavishly illustrated, textually rich book. Did they or did they not reach the summit of Mount Everest back in 1924.
It is amazing, and a credit to those early expeditioners' courage and fortitude, in braving such an inhospitable and harsh terrain with the inadequate clothing and equipment available to them at the time. Unfortunately, the ultimate question still remains unanswered. Mallory and Irvine were certainly intrepid explorers. With its discovery of George Leigh Mallory's body, it enjoyed much success. This book is sure to provide the reader with many hours of enjoyment. The photographs which memorialize this discovery are amazingly lovely and tasteful, considering its subject matter, and hauntingly illustrate the finality with which Everest may deal with mountaineers, no matter how accomplished.
The 1999 Mallory & Irvine Research Expedition was a meticulously well prepared and well organized venture. The research and analysis that went into its ultimate, well thought out conclusions were comprehensive and fascinating, with its strong reliance upon forensics and deductive reasoning. The photographs also highlight how ill equipped for the harsh climatic conditions were the early Everest expeditions. This book is a fitting tribute to two men who sought to make a historic summit and, in their attempt, would forever be a part of Everest.
This book is sure to provide the reader with many hours of enjoyment.The book chronicles the search for George Mallory and Andrew Irvine by the 1999 Mallory & Irvine Research Expedition. Their reconstruction of Mallory's and Irvine's last climb is riveting. This is a beautifully and lavishly illustrated, textually rich book. The 1999 Mallory & Irvine Research Expedition was a meticulously well prepared and well organized venture. It is amazing, and a credit to those early expeditioners' courage and fortitude, in braving such an inhospitable and harsh terrain with the inadequate clothing and equipment available to them at the time. It juxtaposes the dramatic turn of events during their expedition with those of the 1924 British Everest Expedition which saw Mallory and Irvine attempt a summit climb, only to disappear into the mists of Everest, never to be seen again. The research and analysis that went into its ultimate, well thought out conclusions were comprehensive and fascinating, with its strong reliance upon forensics and deductive reasoning.
Did they or did they not reach the summit of Mount Everest back in 1924.The beautiful photographs of the personal effects found upon Mallory's person underscore a certain poignancy about the discovery of Mallory's well preserved body. Its heavy, glossy pages demand the reader's undivided attention and are sure to enthrall all mystery lovers, Everest aficionados, nostalgia junkies, history buffs, and climbing enthusiasts. Unfortunately, the ultimate question still remains unanswered. It makes for a spell binding narrative, as past events are woven through present day ones. With its discovery of George Leigh Mallory's body, it enjoyed much success. The photographs which memorialize this discovery are amazingly lovely and tasteful, considering its subject matter, and hauntingly illustrate the finality with which Everest may deal with mountaineers, no matter how accomplished.The photographs also highlight how ill equipped for the harsh climatic conditions were the early Everest expeditions. Mallory and Irvine were certainly intrepid explorers.This book is a fitting tribute to two men who sought to make a historic summit and, in their attempt, would forever be a part of Everest.
We were only expecting a crude documentary about the Mallory/Irvine climb and subsequent search. However, the authors provided a quality read - well organized and supported by quality color photographs. Respectability was added to the events from this book, offering varying possibilities of what might have happened on the mountain, minus the normal excitability surrounding Mallory/Irvine. We'll keep this as a good reference; almost coffee table quality.
|
